>Sexual reproduction results in offspring that are identical to either the mother or “father” yukkuri. However, A yukkuri that had intercourse with an Alice-type will only give birth to more Alice-types.
OBJECTION! There was that story where a Remirya was raped by a group of Alice-types, birthed 4 little Remiryas, and was eventually forced to sell and cook parts of her children (only so much that they would still regenerate). 193.227.196.195 11:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Stealing from a dead yukkuri is taboo and will result in the culprit being hunted down by its peers.
I find it dubious that yukkuri have morals like this. In order to feel deeply emotional about the rights of a dead being, they must first feel deeply emotional about said being while they are living. The yukkuri itself seems incapable of moral thought seeing as how they are very instinctive (lacking higher brain function, not like they have any brains in the first place). Being so, coupled with short term memory, I find it highly likely that yukkuris are in fact more prone to do the OPPOSITE. I shall compare they to hamsters. It is more likely that they would steal fom each other, eat their own children if they cannot find food, and even eat each other. Being dead or alive having no bearing on it at all.
I take it that this has been derived from some doujinshi. At some point, we all need to decide where we draw the line of what yukkuri doujin plots are acceptable, and which are not. --69.224.48.107 03:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
When we discussed it, the consensus was that it's LOLMAGIC. The same way that they *know* when a non-yukkuri has stolen an accessory: it's not a moral thing, but programmed in, and doesn't rely on anyone actually witnessing said event. 193.227.196.195 14:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
paradox:
- The act of stealing an accessory is not looked down upon, unless the accessory is stolen from a dead yukkuri.
- Stealing a yukkuri’s accessory will cause every yukkuri in the world to chase you.