Indeed there's a meme "キャーイクサーン". A joke about number; "i" "ku" "san" could be read as "193". And Iku's "Saturday Night Fever" comes to the close relationship between Iku & Saturday. So when anonyms on Touhou Gensou Ita (Touhou Illusion Board) find the current time 19:03 or Saturday, they're tempted by Iku's cuty to write down "キャーイクサーン" (Woow, Iku sa~n!) in half-width font somehow. Other usage is when they heard the thunder's bursting noise, because Iku has Spellcard of Thunder. The latter has another type "ギャーイクサーン" (Nooo, Iku sa~n).
So the Redirect page is valid; but I think the Redirect page isn't needed. If "Iku san" is needed, "Sakuya san", "Ran sama", "Eirin shishou", "Eiki sama", "Sanae san", "Kanako sama", "Suwako sama"... Should these be edited really, even if "Iku san" is the funniest & most famous meme? The Redirect page isn't needed. It should be enough to be edited in the list of "Fun Facts" of Iku Nagae, I think. --Masuo64 15:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- I personally think there is no problem with having many redirects for the sake of comprehensiveness, even if they don't get used. _dk 23:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds like a case of "Fun fact" to me rather than a messy redirect.--Umhyuk 03:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
That was weird.. I thought Iku had a name called Ikusan too, because Iki also had a name called Ikisan.
- Explain logically, please, Minosuki. You're the person who once made the article "Tamifuru Miko", aren't you? Why "Ikusan" is in struggle seems quite similar to why that article was deleted.
- And some questions to you.
- 1. About the character data, this wiki must archive just the official characters, because we can imagine easily that many article & list of fan-fic characters would be shameless to be decorated & spilt over if their articles were admitted to be archived. Why on earth do you try eagerly to make the own article of original characters who were made by amateur or didn't appear in official works?
- 2. Why could the case that Iku is called "Iki san" lead to the case that Iku is called "Iku san", more precisely, the case that we should make the article "Ikusan"?
- 3. I've never heard "Iki san", at least on Japanese doujin area, but is this word really used by some people? Is this really important? Isn't this possibly a kind of vowel harmony among the particular groups?
- 4. イクサン is a combination; "Iku" (personal name) and "san" (honorific suffix). So why not "Iku san" but "Ikusan"? (This doesn't mean I suggest that we should make the article or redirect page of "Iku san".)
- 5. You should not have made a copy edit. On skimming, this article seemed all the same as "Iku Nagae". Why did you that?
- As I mentioned above, I don't doubt the necessity of the edit about "Ikusan" (indeed "kya~ iku sa~n" is a little pretty phrase), but I think the own page isn't needed. I'm not satisfied with your explanation short of words, or logic. I'm afraid you can't be helped, at least, to be called troll in the current situation. --Masuo64 20:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)